Counter-Strike: 9INE vs GamerLegion (BO3) - Super DraculaN Group A

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

This market tracks the Lower Bracket quarterfinal 1 match in Counter-Strike 2 between 9INE and GamerLegion, scheduled for 11:00 AM ET on 24 June within the Super DraculaN Group A. The event is a direct continuation of their recent Stake Ranked Episode 1 encounter where GamerLegion secured a decisive 2-0 victory over 9INE on Ancient and Inferno, pushing 9INE into the Lower Bracket while GamerLegion advanced to the Upper Bracket Semi-Finals[1].

Historically, when a team drops to the Lower Bracket after a 2-0 loss to a higher-ranked opponent, their win probability in the subsequent tiebreaker often remains suppressed unless the lower-ranked side demonstrates significant resilience. In this case, GamerLegion entered the match ranked 22 globally while 9INE was ranked 47, a disparity that typically correlates with a low crowd-implied probability for the lower-ranked side[2]. Programmatically, traders would model this by applying a decay factor to 9INE’s historical performance against top-tier opponents, noting that similar Lower Bracket scenarios in CS2 have frequently resolved with the higher-ranked team prevailing unless a specific roster change or map advantage is announced.

Key catalysts to monitor include any official roster updates from either team, map-specific preparation announcements, and the finalisation of the Lower Bracket schedule dependencies. Recent coverage of the CCT North Europe Series #2 playoffs highlighted the importance of map selection in determining outcomes for teams with divergent rankings, suggesting that 9INE’s ability to secure a win hinges on their preparation for specific maps like Anubis or Ancient[6]. Traders should also watch for any delay notifications beyond the seven-day window, as a cancellation would reset the market to a 50-50 resolution, though current data indicates the match is proceeding as scheduled.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Polymarket Bot UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Bot UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.