Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by 2026?

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Kharg Island, Iran's primary crude oil export terminal in the Persian Gulf, would need to fall under sustained control of a foreign state or occupying force—not merely suffer temporary military strikes or disruption—for this market to resolve affirmatively by end-March 2026. The island has endured repeated attacks since the 1980s Iran-Iraq War, including strikes during the 2019 tanker tensions and periodic drone or missile incidents, yet Iranian administrative and military presence has remained continuous. The settlement criteria explicitly exclude bombardment, sabotage, and offshore naval presence, requiring instead a fundamental shift in sovereignty comparable to territorial occupation.

Historical precedent suggests such a transition is exceptionally rare in the Gulf region. The 0% crowd probability reflects the absence of credible military capability among potential actors to seize and hold the island against Iranian resistance within fifteen months. Saudi Arabia and the UAE lack amphibious assault capacity; Israel's operational range and political calculus favour strikes on nuclear or strategic targets rather than oil infrastructure seizure; the United States maintains no active occupation agenda in Iranian territory post-2021. Comparable cases—the Falkland Islands recapture (1982) or Kuwait's liberation (1991)—required either explicit invasion or coalition warfare at scale.

Traders monitoring this market should track escalation patterns: direct US military involvement in the region, formal declarations of war, or announced multinational intervention operations. Recent reporting from Reuters and regional defence analysts indicates no mobilisation toward such scenarios. Programmatic monitoring should flag announcements from US Central Command, NATO statements regarding Iran, or formal security guarantees to Gulf states that explicitly reference territorial control objectives.

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Bot UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Bot UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Bot UK?

Zero. Polymarket Bot UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.