Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Polymarket Bot UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Place a position → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Place a position → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Place a position → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Place a position → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Place a position → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Map 1 Winner | 100% |
| Match Winner | 100% |
| O/U 2.5 Games | 100% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: BIG (-3.5) vs NIP (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-3.5) vs BIG (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 18.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: BIG (-6.5) vs NIP (+6.5) | 100% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 15.5 | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-3.5) vs BIG (+3.5) | 1% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 1% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: BIG (-9.5) vs NIP (+9.5) | 1% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: BIG (-12.5) vs NIP (+12.5) | 1% |
| Map 2 Winner | 0% |
| Map Handicap: NIP (-1.5) vs BIG (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-3.5) vs BIG (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: BIG (-3.5) vs NIP (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map Handicap: BIG (-1.5) vs NIP (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: BIG (-3.5) vs NIP (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: BIG (-6.5) vs NIP (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-6.5) vs BIG (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: NIP (-9.5) vs BIG (+9.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 27.5 | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: BIG (-6.5) vs NIP (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: BIG (-9.5) vs NIP (+9.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 27.5 | 0% |
Market context
On 4 July at 4:00 AM ET, BIG and Ninjas in Pyjamas face off in a decisive Counter-Strike Round 4 match for the XSE Pro League Group Stage, with the crowd-implied probability currently locked at 100% for a BIG victory. This near-total certainty is unusual in esports, where even dominant teams face unpredictable variables like roster instability or tactical shifts. Historically, such extreme odds have only materialised when one side holds a clear, unassailable advantage, as seen in NiP’s legendary 34-map win streak during CS:GO’s early peak[3]. Yet, head-to-head records between these two teams remain competitive, with no single side dominating consistently in recent CS2 encounters[1], suggesting the 100% figure may reflect conditional market mechanics rather than pure form.
Traders approaching this programmatically should monitor for roster announcements, schedule dependencies, and potential forfeiture clauses that could trigger the 50-50 settlement if the match is delayed beyond seven days or ends in a tie. A recent Liquipedia entry confirms NiP’s historical dominance in major events, but current roster data remains fluid, with Reddit discussions highlighting ongoing uncertainty about their early clan-era lineage and player transitions[5]. For conditional order bots, the key catalyst is the match’s completion status: if BIG wins via opponent disqualification or walkover, the market resolves to BIG; if the match is abandoned mid-play, it defaults to 50-50. Traders must verify real-time stream feeds and official league updates to confirm whether the match proceeds as scheduled, as any deviation could invalidate the current probability.
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Polymarket Bot UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Polymarket Bot UK trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade Counter-Strike: BIG vs NIP (BO3) - XSE Pro League Gr… on Polymarket Bot UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →