Roland Garros ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Alejandro Tabilo

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Auger-Aliassime faces Tabilo in the French Open men's draw, with the Canadian seeded higher and favoured at 65% implied probability. The match was originally scheduled for 1 June 2026 at 05:00 ET, giving traders a narrow window to monitor draw confirmations and any surface-condition delays typical of clay-court tournaments. Settlement occurs 8 June, allowing a seven-day buffer for rescheduling without triggering the 50-50 tie resolution.

Auger-Aliassime's recent form provides the baseline for the current odds. He reached the US Open semi-final in 2024 and maintains a top-15 ranking, though clay remains his weaker surface relative to hard courts. Tabilo, ranked outside the top 50, has shown improvement on European clay but lacks the consistency record against top-20 opponents that would justify significant probability compression. Historical matchups between players of this ranking differential typically settle near 60-70% for the higher-ranked player, placing current odds within expected range.

Traders should monitor ATP injury bulletins and the official Roland Garros draw publication for confirmation of seeding and scheduling. Weather delays are material—Paris clay matches frequently shift by 24-48 hours due to rain, and the settlement window's seven-day clause means a match pushed beyond 8 June would resolve 50-50 regardless of eventual outcome. Conditional order logic should account for draw confirmation as a prerequisite trigger, since unconfirmed matches carry cancellation risk. Court assignment and surface conditions on match day will influence in-play movement, particularly if rain forecasts emerge closer to the scheduled date.

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Bot UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Bot UK?

Zero. Polymarket Bot UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Bot UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.