Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Polymarket Bot UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Place a position → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Place a position → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Place a position → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Place a position → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Place a position → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva (-1.5) | 0% |
| FK Crvena zvezda (-1.5) | 0% |
| MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva (-2.5) | 0% |
| FK Crvena zvezda (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| FK Crvena zvezda O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| FK Crvena zvezda O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| FK Crvena zvezda O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| FK Crvena zvezda 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| FK Crvena zvezda 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| FK Crvena zvezda 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| FK Crvena zvezda 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
Hapoel Be'er Sheva and FK Crvena zvezda are playing a UEFA Champions League qualifying tie, with the scheduled kick-off shown at 17:30 UTC and the match listed at a neutral venue in Szombathely, Hungary on multiple fixtures pages.[2][5][11] For a “more markets” prediction market, the clean way to treat this contract programmatically is as a derivative of the match itself: if the fixture is delayed, switched, or the feed updates the competition state, the key issue is whether additional markets are actually published before the settlement window closes, not who wins the game.[2][5]
The 0% YES crowd price reflects a market that is usually binary on liquidity rather than on football strength. Comparable qualifiers show that Hapoel reached this round after beating Víkingur Reykjavík 3-2 on aggregate, while Crvena zvezda advanced with a 9-0 aggregate win over Larne, so the broader event has already generated enough sub-markets around score, total goals and team news to make “more markets” plausible in principle, even if the crowd is not assigning any probability to new listings yet.[4][17] In tooling terms, traders would normally watch whether the book exposes fresh lines, whether the market count changes after line-up publication, and whether settlement is tied to exchange state rather than the on-pitch result.
The main catalysts are administrative rather than tactical: official match-status changes, late line-up confirmation, and any market expansion before the settlement window ends at 17:30 UTC.[1][2] Team-data pages also flag that Hapoel have injury absences listed for Pedro Amador and João Victor, while Crvena zvezda are shown without unavailable players, which can matter if new derivative markets appear around cards, corners, or scorers after team sheets are released.[8] A recent preview also noted the tie as first-leg qualifying at a neutral venue, which is the sort of dependency that often drives whether extra markets are added at all.[17]
Methodology
We track MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva vs. FK Crvena zvezda - More Markets across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Polymarket Bot UK. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade MH Hapoel Be'er Sheva vs. FK Crvena zvezda - More Ma… on Polymarket Bot UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →