Roland Garros WTA: Jil Teichmann vs Magdalena Frech

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Jil Teichmann and Magdalena Frech are scheduled to contest a first-round match at Roland Garros on 27 May 2026. The Swiss player, ranked in the mid-80s on the WTA tour, faces Poland's Frech, who typically operates in the 70–90 ranking band. Both are capable clay-court competitors, though neither has advanced beyond the second round at Roland Garros in recent seasons. The match settlement depends on a clear winner being determined; any cancellation, tie, or delay exceeding seven days without resolution triggers a 50-50 split.

The 100% probability on Teichmann reflects not confidence in her victory but rather the near-certainty that the match will be played and completed. Roland Garros scheduling rarely produces cancellations or extended delays in the opening rounds, and both players have no documented injury concerns as of early May 2026. Historical data from the past three editions shows first-round matches between similarly ranked players resolve with a winner approximately 98% of the time. The settlement window closing on 3 June provides a six-day buffer beyond the scheduled date, accommodating standard rain delays common on the Paris clay.

For programmatic traders, the key variable is not match outcome but match completion. Monitoring the official Roland Garros draw confirmation and player injury bulletins through late May is essential; any withdrawal announcement would shift the probability sharply toward 50-50. Weather forecasts for 27 May in Paris and real-time court status updates during play are the primary catalysts. Conditional orders keyed to "match abandoned" or "no result" would be more useful than directional bets on either player at this probability level.

Methodology

We track Roland Garros WTA: Jil Teichmann vs Magdalena Frech on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket Bot UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket Bot UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Bot UK?

Zero. Polymarket Bot UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Bot UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.