Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Polymarket Bot UK) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Place a position → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Place a position → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Place a position → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Place a position → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Place a position → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie | 100% |
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Set 2 Winner | 100% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 100% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 0% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Match O/U 21.5 | 0% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Match O/U 22.5 | 0% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie Match O/U 23.5 | 0% |
Market context
Jan Choinski and Jamie Mackenzie were scheduled to meet in Bonn on 2 August, with the market tied to whether Choinski advances out of that match. The crowd price of **100% YES** is much stronger than the pre-match betting line, where external feeds put Choinski roughly around 1.20–1.22 and Mackenzie around 4.00–4.10, implying a large favourite but not a literal certainty[1][2][5]. For a programmatic trader, that gap matters: a 100% market on a decisive pre-match favourite can still be vulnerable if the event is postponed, abandoned, or otherwise fails to produce an official winner inside the settlement rules.
Historically, this kind of market is read more like a state machine than a pure win/loss call. If the match starts and one player is later awarded the result, the market should still resolve to that player; if it is not played at all, or slips beyond the seven-day window without a winner, the contract falls to 50-50 under the stated rules. That means bots watching this event should track not just live scores, but status changes, retirements, walkovers, and schedule updates, because those are the edge cases that can override the match odds. The available match feeds currently list the fixture as a final in Bonn, which supports the view that the event was expected to be completed rather than left unresolved[1][2][8].
The main catalysts are therefore operational rather than tactical: official start-time changes, court assignment updates, a late withdrawal, or any interruption that pushes resolution past the deadline. At the time of the latest market snapshots, several data providers still had the pairing on the Bonn schedule with Choinski as the clear market leader, while Kalshi-style pricing also leaned heavily towards Choinski, reinforcing the consensus but leaving a small settlement risk around completion mechanics[4][6][7][13]. For copy-trading or conditional-order systems, the practical check is simple: confirm the event has begun, confirm the player who advances, and then verify there is no cancellation or non-completion path that could force the market to 50-50.
Methodology
We track Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Polymarket Bot UK. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Polymarket Bot UK trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Bonn: Jan Choinski vs Jamie Mackenzie on Polymarket Bot UK
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →