Lyon: Daniel Galan vs Felix Balshaw

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Daniel Galan, the Colombian professional ranked in the ATP's lower tier, faces Felix Balshaw in an early-round match at the Lyon tournament scheduled for 13 June 2026. The market currently reflects 100% implied probability for resolution, suggesting traders anticipate the match will proceed as scheduled and produce a decisive outcome by the settlement deadline of 20 June.

Historical ATP Challenger and lower-ranked matchups typically resolve without incident when both players are confirmed entries. Galan has competed regularly on the Challenger circuit, whilst Balshaw remains an emerging talent. Markets pricing such encounters at extreme probabilities often reflect the straightforward nature of professional scheduling—cancellations at established venues like Lyon are rare, and walkovers or retirements, whilst possible, occur in a minority of cases. The 7-day grace period built into the resolution criteria provides substantial buffer against fixture delays, making the 100% reading plausible if both players are fit and the tournament proceeds normally.

Traders monitoring this match programmatically should track ATP entry lists and any official tournament updates from the Lyon organisers, typically published via the ATP website and tournament communications. Injury announcements or late withdrawals would be the primary catalyst shifting probability away from the current extreme. The settlement window extends to 20 June, providing a week beyond the scheduled date for the match to conclude. Any fixture postponement beyond that window without a completed result would trigger the 50-50 resolution clause, making real-time fixture confirmation essential for conditional order logic.

Methodology

We track Lyon: Daniel Galan vs Felix Balshaw on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket Bot UK?

Zero. Polymarket Bot UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket Bot UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.