National Bank Open: Rafael Jodar vs Corentin Moutet

Platform comparison

Market context

Rafael Jodar and Corentin Moutet are set for a second-round meeting at the National Bank Open in Montreal, and the market is effectively pricing a matchup between a rising 19-year-old Spaniard and a more established left-hander ranked around the top 60. Jodar’s recent results are the cleaner baseline: sources put him well ahead on 2026 match wins and with a markedly stronger season winning percentage, while Moutet’s year has been patchier, with a sub-50% overall record and weaker recent form indicators.[2][3][7][13]

For probability-reading purposes, the key feature is the absence of any head-to-head history, so there is no prior stylistic evidence for model calibration.[1][2][11] In comparable ATP events, markets on unseeded or low-data pairings tend to lean heavily on ranking gap, season win rate, and surface splits rather than name recognition. On hard courts, Jodar’s reported hard-court numbers are solid enough to justify a favourite position, but Moutet’s experience at tour level and left-handed profile remain the main reasons the price is not more extreme.[1][2][3]

For a programmatic trader, the practical catalysts are straightforward: confirm that the match is actually placed on the order of play, then watch for any schedule drift, court assignment changes, or withdrawals before first ball. Live listing services currently show the match around 06 August with Jodar listed higher in ATP ranking terms, which is consistent with the market’s current 73% yes price, but final routing can still move on late tournament updates or a postponed start.[8][9][13] Because this market settles to 50-50 if the match is not played within seven days of the scheduled date, bots using conditional orders should also track cancellation and delay risk rather than only pre-match win probabilities.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Polymarket Bot UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does Polymarket cost to trade?

Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.